Category Archives: Culture

The Abolition Of Gender

Posted by Fullcouch on January 17, 2012, 7:55pm

The Left uses same sex marriage as their icebreaker in attempting to destroy the differences between the sexes. (They don’t even say sex, they say gender because it is less delineating).
Eliminating the sexes means eliminating diversity, thus, creating a faceless, more easily manipulative society.
Surrender your liberty, your freedom, your gender……for utopia?

American Thinker – Patrick Fagan, family scholar at the U.S.-based Family Research Council, declares that defining gender as a mere social construct is “evidence of thought so divorced from reality as to be a form of mental illness.”

Well, yes.

Alas, the mental illness has metastasized, establishing colonies of the mentally deranged in North America, including the California Teachers’ Association, which, as reported by the Christian Examiner, held a conference during which the association’s conference presenters and program received materials advocating “gender liberation.”

According to the materials, male-female distinctions must be eliminated in order to “liberate” children from unnecessary stereotypes about what it means to be male or female. To be absolutely clear, the anti-genderists are not seeking “equal rights,” but obliteration of the distinctions between male and female.

For example, the conference literature included this instruction on “gender etiquette”:

“Please do not assume anyone’s gender, even people you may have met in the past. A person’s external appearance may not match their internal gender identity.”

“You cannot know the gender or sex of someone by their physical body, voice, appearance or mannerisms.”

Pay attention to a person’s purposeful gender expression. We consider it polite to ask: “What pronoun do you prefer?” or “How do you identify?” before using pronouns or gendered words for anyone.

One way of acknowledging the needs of all people is to designate restrooms as gender neutral.

“Respectful allies, who learn from and with everyone and then educate others, are important for successful gender liberation.”

Each of us can decide for ourselves in which bathroom we belong.
It appears that the powerful group of leaders within the CTA wants to brainwash children into believing that gender neutrality (androgyny) is the new ideal for society.

Maybe our children will learn the new androgyny in ways similar to those being advocated in British Columbia, where a gender coach recently was videotaped earnestly assuring elementary schoolchildren that they can be any sex they choose.

What does all this madness, now being inserted into our public schools, mean?

Quite frankly, if our society accepts gender redefinition as a merely societal construct, it means the end of civilization as we know it — not mere reformation or transformation, but the abolition of civilization itself.

The entire social construct of any given society is based on gender distinction — man and woman. The differences in gender are the first and most essential ways in which human beings relate to one another: mother and father, husband and wife; brother and sister, aunt and uncle, daughter-in-law, brother-in law — just to name a few.

The beginning of individuation is gender; the elimination of it ensures the destruction of individuality and absorption into an amorphous, indistinct communality.

Elimination of gender distinctions means entering a Brave New World in which everybody belongs to everybody else, and all belong to the state. It is to achieve the disappearance of the “other” that complements us. It is to attempt to absorb all of humanity into the All by eradication of distinctions.

How ironic that those who purport to desire diversity actually are seeking the abolition of diversity at the most fundamental level. That is because they favor the communal versus the individual. The elimination of individuality starts with the elimination of sex, and the new unisex identity is always an indicator of tyranny, as faceless and sexless masses are more easily manipulated by an all-powerful state. It is notable, for instance, that Mao Tse Tung’s blue-suited masses were without obvious sexual distinction.

Read on….The insanity is gripping.
The abolition of gender


Rich Is The New Gay

Posted by Fullcouch on January 14, 2012, 9:55am

Moment of Clarity – It’s ok to hate them for who they are. It’s ok to vandalize their property, taunt them, seize their assets, deny them government benefits, make them register and buy a license to practice their alternative lifestyle.

You can hound them at their workplace, you can bully them in schools, you can picket their homes, you can send them death threats with impunity, and you can occupy public buildings for months on end chanting bad things about them.

Rich is the new gay.

It is no longer permissible in our civil society to hate based on skin color, gender, ethnicity, religion, disability, or sexual preference. But wealth – that’s a free-fire zone. Wealth is evil. Capitalism is sodomy. Free enterprise is lewd and lascivious conduct. Wall Street is the new Castro Street, only it’s ok to light it on fire. Even Tiffany Newt feels free to tee off on Mitt Romney for being (gasp) too rich – think Ellen reefing on Elton John to win George Michael’s vote.

You can say the most hateful things imaginable about rich people – even the President does it, cheered on by a wealth-o-phobic media. Imagine how the fur would fly if a President blamed all his failures on homosexuals, or if he expressed support for violent mobs rioting in the streets if it were the 3.6% instead of the 1% whose heads are demanded on a pole.

The left/right paradigms for wealth and sexual preference are pretty much the same: liberals insist that material preference is assigned at birth; conservatives believe it is a choice. Closet richos like Michael Moore or the Obamas possess the same self-loathing false piety as Ted Haggert or Larry Craig. Their response to being outed is loud, angry denial; wide stance or baseball cap, the disguise doesn’t fool anyone.

The rich even have their transgendered equivalents – trans-wealthered, I suppose – who have crossed over from the poor side to the rich side. I don’t think the abuse hurled against Herman Cain was because he was black; it was because he is black and refused to stay poor. To the haters, that is one sick puppy. Tim Tebow is even worse – openly rich, openly humble, and openly Christian. Unforgivable.

I can’t explain the liberals’ reflexive hatred of wealthy people. Perhaps they are guilty about the way their own leaders have enriched themselves – Obama, Corzine, Soros, Pelosi, Kennedy, Gore, Trumka, Jackson, Hillary the pork belly whisperer. If all you know is swindling and influence peddling, then maybe that’s all you can imagine.

Whenever I say something nice about rich people in a column, I can count on a deluge of angry comments and personal attacks. The number of things haters guess wrong about me reveals a prejudice so deep-seated that it can’t be tempered by reason. The last acceptable negative stereotype is the rich white guy – presumptively unethical, presumptively privileged, presumptively unaccomplished and undeserving.

People who hate rich people don’t like it when I credit rich businesspeople for improving our living standards. They say that the only reason that rich people ever improve products, workplace rules, and the environment is because unions or government force them. Rich people are inherently evil and greedy and left to their own devices would poison us and starve us to death – they can’t help themselves.

But let’s think about that. The government only forces them to pay their workers a wage of $7.25 per hour, and yet private employers pay a median wage of $21.10 per hour. Why? Who makes them do that? Not unions – only 7% of private sector employees choose to be represented by unions. How is it possible that rich people would voluntarily pay poorer people triple what the law requires? Hmmm.

And government does not force any employer to provide benefits, either; yet the average private sector employee receives $17,000 worth from his evil rich employer. Health insurance, holidays, and how about vacation days – nobody forces rich people to pay you to take time off with your family, but they do. How un-greedy is that?

Want more? Tuition reimbursement, retirement savings matches, private loans, contributions to charities, service on community boards, partnering with schools and government agencies, funding recreation, the arts, museums – show me the law that was passed by the progressives that makes rich people do any of that.

Or tell me what union went out on strike until the employer agreed to build a soccer field for inner city kids or fund scholarships for girls in non-traditional careers? Which one traded a wage increase for increased funding of Boys and Girls clubs or Junior Achievement? That’s what owners do all the time, into the billions.

Some employers’ subsidized cafeterias are the only decent meals their employees will eat during the week. Nobody made them do that; and they want to starve the poor, remember? Poison their water, take away their health care, shut down schools for their kids, hate women – stuff like that. Not offer free mammograms.

Do you think that executives must sit on civic boards under some court-ordered community service sentence? Is it like the Huber law – we get a pass to get out of work to do it? Why would rich people give so much of their time and money to the poor, the sick, and the disadvantaged if they really hated them as much as liberals say we do?

Most of the rich people I know used to be a lot poorer than most of the people I know calling them names. Now that I think about it, most people I know calling them names have never been poor a day in their life – not really poor, not like the poverty I have seen.

The average American worker earns 29 times as much as the average worker in the world’s bottom quintile – that is a lot bigger guilt-gap than between our worker and his CEO. What does that prove – that the American workers are even more greedy and selfish than the dreaded CEO? No, it proves we are very productive top to bottom in the working class, and yes, business owners work their tails off.

Rich is the new gay, so go ahead and hate if you must. But remember this: gay people can’t make you gay, but rich people can make you rich. That is, if you quit screaming at them long enough to ask them how they did it. That is how most of us trans-wealthered people started our rise on the updraft.; we shut up and listened.

I bet you Romney’s $10,000 that any one of them would be glad to tell you if you asked nicely. Try it. – Tim Nerenz

Rich is the new gay


The Sec-Progs Attack on Tebow Just Proves Their Inverted World

Posted from Mexico City by Fullcouch on December 27, 2011, 10:15am

Win, lose or draw, Tim Tebow brings out the worst of the secular Left. It’s amazing how just his mere mention of Jesus triggers an apoplectic response from the Bill Maher clan. Ironically, I support them just as much as I support the Occupy Wall Street lunatics. They offer us one very valuable thing; clarity.
The line between the Left and the Right has never been more clearly defined by those who despise capitalism and Christianity. Two of the values that built this country are being attacked by those who wish to break her down.
The assault on Tim Tebow only rears the Left’s inverted ugly head

Tagged , ,

The War on Christianity is Alive, and, Unfortunately Well

Posted from Mexico City by Fullcouch on December 26, 2011, 7:20pm

The Left aren’t too gung ho on religion. You know, the one where there’s a God, sets of rules, responsibilities, moral values, consequences, etc. Leftism IS their religion. We don’t need no stinking God, might as well be their mantra. So, as a result, they’ve decided that the way to diminish and dissolve religion, Christianity primarily, is to sell the sensitivity product to the public. Some people are offended by the mere mention of God, so we’ll just say “Happy Holidays” and say nothing when someone sneezes. Unfortunately this movement has reached into the core of our nations’ values and is changing us for the worse.
“No nation has ever existed or been governed without religion, nor can be,” Jefferson wrote to a friend. “The Christian religion is the best religion that has been given to man, and I, as Chief Magistrate of this nation, am bound to give it the sanction of my example.”
The war on Christmas is a war on Christianity

Tagged ,

Liberty vs. Statism – Carry Thyself, or Be Carried

Posted by Fullcouch on December 19, 2011, 8:35am

Putting faith and trust into a nanny government will only give you western Europe. Look no farther than across the Atlantic. Allow me to fail, and I’ll allow myself to succeed.
It’s Spreading Liberty, Stupid


Liberal Media Bias? Whhaat Liberal Media Bias? Here’s the Top 50

Posted by Fullcouch on December 17, 2011, 4:50pm

Learn a few of these and you’ll be armed to the hilt to take down any liberal argument.
E.g., Timothy McVeigh was NOT a Christian, but believed science was his religion.
Top 50 Examples of Liberal Media Bias – Warner Todd Huston

Tagged , ,

Equality: Another Religion of the Left

Posted by Fullcouch on December 17, 2011, 12:35pm

The Right believes in liberty in order to thrive. The Left believes in equality in order to get by.
“Equality” trumps liberty

Tagged ,